By signing you agree to sign the Petition and to forward it to the competent offices of the Municipality of Padua.

You can read our Privacy Policy here


Petition for the approval of the Declaration of Civic and Collective Use and the recognition of the Ex-Macello area in Via Cornaro in Padua as a common

The rights belonging to the community are one of the oldest and deepest forms of legal reality and social ties. In Roman law they concern the forms of collective use of land not assigned to private individuals and available to the entire community.

Their use, their rediscovery, is important both from a legal point of view and from a cultural and social one that draws inspiration from the past for a more harmonious coexistence among people and between people and the environment of which they are part.

The theme of the valorisation of public goods, oriented towards public interest purposes, is closely intertwined with that of urban regeneration and the theme of the temporary use or re-use of public spaces and buildings.

In this sense, the commons represent a theoretical and practical test case for the effectiveness of rights.

In October 2021, the Municipality of Padua approved the Commons Regulation, which, alongside cooperation Agreements with citizens, recognises the declaration of civic and collective use with reference to commons.

In Padua, since 1973, a large community has been active in the area of the Ex-Macello in Via Cornaro. This community was inspired by the extraordinary cultural and educational work of Francesco Piva, founder of the Comunità per le Libere Attività Culturali (CLAC). On 23 December, the reference assembly of this community presented the City of Padua with a draft declaration of civic and collective use of the Ex-Macello area as a commons, with extensive documentation of the activities and processes of care of the area between 1973 and 2021, and declared itself willing to interact with the local administration to verify and finalise the recognition through a public and shared process.

Unfortunately, the reply received from the municipality on 18 January did not reveal any recognition of the civic activity carried out and documented in the area of the former slaughterhouse. Nor is there any procedural attention to the provisions of the Regulation: the Declaration of Civic and Collective Use, submitted to the Municipality, on the basis of Article 7, paragraph 4 of the Regulation on Common Goods, provides for two executive decisions (by the Sector Head of the organisational unit responsible for the process and the Sector Head concerned by the definition of the same). Paragraph 3 of Article 7 also states that the identification of the common good must be approved by the municipal council before being approved according to paragraph 4.

Despite the willingness of the assembly of reference for the area to initiate a process of comparison that urged the Municipality to define the modalities and timing, no indications were received either on the procedure and documentation relating to the executive determinations, or on the approval of the common good by the Municipal Council.

However, the reply from the municipality indicates that a project for the area has already been drawn up. This project has not been disclosed and does not seem to have been conceived in the knowledge that it concerns an area already perceived as a commons, characterised by civic use, a reference point for many citizens, and on which consultation and proposal processes have already been carried out, documented and disclosed: did these processes and documents not deserve a public response and discussion?

To date, despite the fact that CLAC has been evicted on the pretext of \’building safety\’, it continues to pay bills for utilities relating to the buildings of the former slaughterhouse, in line with the way in which it initially occupied the area, having been given the keys to open the gate by the municipality, which is evidence of \’consensual\’ occupation.

We recall the importance that this area has had for the schools of this city from a formative and educational point of view and for the people who have passed through and inhabited this space over decades. We consider the recognition of this form of intangible heritage as equally important as other cultural representations and as the bearer of a conception of prestige rooted in the conscience and memory of the community.

The undersigned ask the Municipality for the recognition and dialogue with this fundamental decades-long experience of civic and collective use of the former slaughterhouse as a commons of the city of Padua.




The rights belonging to the community are one of the oldest and deepest forms of legal reality and social ties. In Roman law they concern the forms of collective use of land not assigned to private individuals and available to the entire community.

Their use, their rediscovery, is important both from a legal point of view and from a cultural and social one that draws inspiration from the past for a more harmonious coexistence among people and between people and the environment of which they are part.

The theme of the valorisation of public goods, oriented towards public interest purposes, is closely intertwined with that of urban regeneration and the theme of the temporary use or re-use of public spaces and buildings.

In this sense, the commons represent a theoretical and practical test case for the effectiveness of rights.

In October 2021, the Municipality of Padua approved the Commons Regulation, which, alongside cooperation Agreements with citizens, recognises the declaration of civic and collective use with reference to commons.

In Padua, since 1973, a large community has been active in the area of the Ex-Macello in Via Cornaro. This community was inspired by the extraordinary cultural and educational work of Francesco Piva, founder of the Comunità per le Libere Attività Culturali (CLAC). On 23 December, the reference assembly of this community presented the City of Padua with a draft declaration of civic and collective use of the Ex-Macello area as a commons, with extensive documentation of the activities and processes of care of the area between 1973 and 2021, and declared itself willing to interact with the local administration to verify and finalise the recognition through a public and shared process.

Unfortunately, the reply received from the municipality on 18 January did not reveal any recognition of the civic activity carried out and documented in the area of the former slaughterhouse. Nor is there any procedural attention to the provisions of the Regulation: the Declaration of Civic and Collective Use, submitted to the Municipality, on the basis of Article 7, paragraph 4 of the Regulation on Common Goods, provides for two executive decisions (by the Sector Head of the organisational unit responsible for the process and the Sector Head concerned by the definition of the same). Paragraph 3 of Article 7 also states that the identification of the common good must be approved by the municipal council before being approved according to paragraph 4.

Despite the willingness of the assembly of reference for the area to initiate a process of comparison that urged the Municipality to define the modalities and timing, no indications were received either on the procedure and documentation relating to the executive determinations, or on the approval of the common good by the Municipal Council.

However, the reply from the municipality indicates that a project for the area has already been drawn up. This project has not been disclosed and does not seem to have been conceived in the knowledge that it concerns an area already perceived as a commons, characterised by civic use, a reference point for many citizens, and on which consultation and proposal processes have already been carried out, documented and disclosed: did these processes and documents not deserve a public response and discussion?

To date, despite the fact that CLAC has been evicted on the pretext of ‘building safety’, it continues to pay bills for utilities relating to the buildings of the former slaughterhouse, in line with the way in which it initially occupied the area, having been given the keys to open the gate by the municipality, which is evidence of ‘consensual’ occupation.

We recall the importance that this area has had for the schools of this city from a formative and educational point of view and for the people who have passed through and inhabited this space over decades. We consider the recognition of this form of intangible heritage as equally important as other cultural representations and as the bearer of a conception of prestige rooted in the conscience and memory of the community.

The undersigned ask the Municipality for the recognition and dialogue with this fundamental decades-long experience of civic and collective use of the former slaughterhouse as a commons of the city of Padua.

[signature]

22 sottoscrizioni

Condividi con i tuoi amici:

facebook twitter



Tutte le sottoscrizioni
22Stefania VisentinFeb 09, 2022
21Isabella RagoFeb 08, 2022
20Teonas BorsettoFeb 08, 2022
19Fiona Clare DalzielFeb 08, 2022
18Fulvio SerasinFeb 07, 2022
17Vincenzo Di NapoliFeb 05, 2022
16Luca XodoFeb 04, 2022
15Nathalie POUSFeb 03, 2022
14Roberta PolimeniFeb 03, 2022
13Alessandro GuaitaFeb 03, 2022
12Ruxandra Nicolau LlullFeb 03, 2022
11Delphine OuturquinFeb 03, 2022
10Steven Job SilvaFeb 03, 2022
9Diana PeltzerFeb 03, 2022
8Manuela ZechnerFeb 03, 2022
7Madiana NurediniFeb 03, 2022
6Anna GuoloFeb 02, 2022
5Giovanni OmodeoFeb 02, 2022
4Piruza NazaryanFeb 02, 2022
3Alexandros KioupkiolisFeb 02, 2022
2Estela Brahimllari Feb 02, 2022
1Susanna CaloreFeb 02, 2022

 

Share this petition:

Facebook
Telegram
WhatsApp
Twitter